CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board granted reconsideration because the WCJ improperly disregarded the Agreed Medical Evaluator's opinion and made a finding without adequate medical evidence. The Board found that due to conflicting medical opinions and the AME's unclear stance, further development of the medical record is required. Consequently, the matter is returned to the trial level for a WCJ to appoint a regular physician to re-examine the applicant and address all outstanding medical issues.
DEENNISE NOVAK vs. GOODHEW AMBULANCE SERVICE, NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE, c/o BROADSPIRE, a CRAWFORD COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board granted reconsideration because the WCJ improperly disregarded the Agreed Medical Evaluator's opinion and made a finding without adequate medical evidence. The Board found that due to conflicting medical opinions and the AME's unclear stance, further development of the medical record is required. Consequently, the matter is returned to the trial level for a WCJ to appoint a "regular physician" to re-examine the applicant and address all outstanding medical issues.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.