CompFox AI Summary
This case involves a lien claimant's petition for reconsideration of a prior denial of their petition. The lien claimant argued the Appeals Board erred in finding they misrepresented the contents of a Stipulations with Request for Award because the defendant failed to serve the Lien Affidavit with the Amended Award. The Appeals Board denied reconsideration, finding the lien claimant was in possession of both the Stipulations and the Lien Affidavit prior to the Amended Award. Even if service was deficient, the lien claimant had other recourse and failed to articulate sufficient legal or factual grounds for reconsideration.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves a lien claimant's petition for reconsideration of a prior denial of their petition. The lien claimant argued the Appeals Board erred in finding they misrepresented the contents of a Stipulations with Request for Award because the defendant failed to serve the Lien Affidavit with the Amended Award. The Appeals Board denied reconsideration, finding the lien claimant was in possession of both the Stipulations and the Lien Affidavit prior to the Amended Award. Even if service was deficient, the lien claimant had other recourse and failed to articulate sufficient legal or factual grounds for reconsideration.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.