Home/Case Law/DEBRA ANTHONY vs. AC TRANSIT, ROSS STORES; SEDGWICK WALNUT CREEK, CAMBRIDGE CONCORD
Regular DecisionReconsideration

DEBRA ANTHONY vs. AC TRANSIT, ROSS STORES; SEDGWICK WALNUT CREEK, CAMBRIDGE CONCORD

Filed: Nov 19, 2010
Oakland
ADJ2137324

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded the prior award due to insufficient substantial medical evidence. The primary treating physician's reports were deemed unreliable as they were based on an inaccurate post-injury work history. The Board found the record needed further development regarding the applicant's disability and cumulative injury. The case is remanded to the trial level for further proceedings, including potentially supplemental medical reporting or deposition.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded the prior award due to insufficient substantial medical evidence. The primary treating physician's reports were deemed unreliable as they were based on an inaccurate post-injury work history. The Board found the record needed further development regarding the applicant's disability and cumulative injury. The case is remanded to the trial level for further proceedings, including potentially supplemental medical reporting or deposition.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

DEBRA ANTHONY vs. AC TRANSIT, ROSS STORES; SEDGWICK WALNUT CREEK, CAMBRIDGE CONCORD (2010) – Oakland | CompFox