CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration, upholding the judge's finding that the applicant was an independent contractor at the time of his injury. The applicant presented arguments that the judge erred in his analysis, but the Board found that the evidence supported the independent contractor classification. This classification was based on factors such as the applicant's control over his work, use of his own tools, and payment method, which aligned with the definition of an independent contractor under Labor Code section 3353.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration, upholding the judge's finding that the applicant was an independent contractor at the time of his injury. The applicant presented arguments that the judge erred in his analysis, but the Board found that the evidence supported the independent contractor classification. This classification was based on factors such as the applicant's control over his work, use of his own tools, and payment method, which aligned with the definition of an independent contractor under Labor Code section 3353.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.