Home/Case Law/DAVID SOTO vs. ADVANCED PACKING & DISTRIBUTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION On Behalf Of RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation
Regular Decision

DAVID SOTO vs. ADVANCED PACKING & DISTRIBUTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION On Behalf Of RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation

Filed: Jan 17, 2008
STK 0142666

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a workers' compensation claim where the applicant sustained an injury while employed by both a general employer (Remedy) and a special employer (Advanced). Remedy's insurer, Reliance, became insolvent, leading CIGA to assume potential liability. The WCJ found that Advanced's insurer, SCIF, provided other insurance under Insurance Code § 1063.1(c)(9), thus relieving CIGA of responsibility. The Appeals Board denied SCIF's reconsideration, affirming that SCIF's policy constituted other insurance and that CIGA is a last resort insurer.

DAVID SOTO vs. ADVANCED PACKING & DISTRIBUTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION On Behalf Of RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a workers' compensation claim where the applicant sustained an injury while employed by both a general employer (Remedy) and a special employer (Advanced). Remedy's insurer, Reliance, became insolvent, leading CIGA to assume potential liability. The WCJ found that Advanced's insurer, SCIF, provided "other insurance" under Insurance Code § 1063.1(c)(9), thus relieving CIGA of responsibility. The Appeals Board denied SCIF's reconsideration, affirming that SCIF's policy constituted "other insurance" and that CIGA is a last resort insurer.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

DAVID SOTO vs. ADVANCED PACKING & DISTRIBUTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION On Behalf Of RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation workers compensation case in . Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

DAVID SOTO vs. ADVANCED PACKING & DISTRIBUTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION On Behalf Of RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation case law summary from . Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

DAVID SOTO vs. ADVANCED PACKING & DISTRIBUTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION On Behalf Of RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation Case Analysis

DAVID SOTO vs. ADVANCED PACKING & DISTRIBUTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION On Behalf Of RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, In Liquidation is a legal case related to workers' compensation in . This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.