Home/Case Law/DAVID SMITH vs. GENERAL MOTORS, TRISTAR, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT
Regular DecisionReconsideration

DAVID SMITH vs. GENERAL MOTORS, TRISTAR, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT

Filed: Apr 06, 2015
Riverside
ADJ1350924 (VNO 0092908)

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns a defendant's petition for reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) award. The original award included a hypoallergenic, adjustable king-size mattress and ongoing personal trainer services for the applicant. The defendant argued the mattress was excessive and the trainer unnecessary. The WCAB denied the defendant's petition, largely adopting the WCJ's reasoning for the original award. However, one commissioner dissented on the mattress award, finding insufficient evidence to justify the specific, expensive model.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns a defendant's petition for reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) award. The original award included a hypoallergenic, adjustable king-size mattress and ongoing personal trainer services for the applicant. The defendant argued the mattress was excessive and the trainer unnecessary. The WCAB denied the defendant's petition, largely adopting the WCJ's reasoning for the original award. However, one commissioner dissented on the mattress award, finding insufficient evidence to justify the specific, expensive model.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

DAVID SMITH vs. GENERAL MOTORS, TRISTAR, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT (2015) – Riverside | CompFox