Home/Case Law/DAVID SIERRA vs. NETVERSANT, INC., and NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionReconsideration

DAVID SIERRA vs. NETVERSANT, INC., and NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Jan 31, 2013
San Jose
ADJ7946701

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a decision that found Applicant sustained a psychiatric injury due to his employer's failure to pay earned commissions. The employer argued the dispute was a good faith personnel action and that the injury was caused by other factors. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, which found the commission dispute was not a good faith personnel action and that the expert medical opinion supported causation by employment events. The Board also noted that documents submitted by the applicant late were not considered due to procedural violations and lack of proof of service.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a decision that found Applicant sustained a psychiatric injury due to his employer's failure to pay earned commissions. The employer argued the dispute was a good faith personnel action and that the injury was caused by other factors. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, which found the commission dispute was not a good faith personnel action and that the expert medical opinion supported causation by employment events. The Board also noted that documents submitted by the applicant late were not considered due to procedural violations and lack of proof of service.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

DAVID SIERRA vs. NETVERSANT, INC., and NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY (2013) – San Jose | CompFox