CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed David Shea's Petition for Reconsideration because it was not filed from a "final" order, but rather an intermediate procedural or evidentiary ruling. The Board also denied Shea's Petition for Removal, finding no evidence of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm that would necessitate this extraordinary remedy. The WCJ's report, which was adopted by the Board, detailed why these petitions were unfounded. Ultimately, the Board upheld the WCJ's decision.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed David Shea's Petition for Reconsideration because it was not filed from a "final" order, but rather an intermediate procedural or evidentiary ruling. The Board also denied Shea's Petition for Removal, finding no evidence of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm that would necessitate this extraordinary remedy. The WCJ's report, which was adopted by the Board, detailed why these petitions were unfounded. Ultimately, the Board upheld the WCJ's decision.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.