CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration. The applicant sought to overturn a finding of 5% permanent disability after apportionment for a neck injury, arguing the medical examiner's opinion was not substantial evidence and that treatment couldn't be apportioned. The Board found the administrative law judge's reliance on the medical examiner's opinion, which attributed the worsening condition to pre-existing degenerative arthritis, was supported by substantial evidence. The Board also clarified that further medical treatment was awarded, but surgery specifically would be considered non-industrial due to the apportionment finding.
DAVID ROMAN vs. REGENTS, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Permissibly Self-Insured, Adjusted By SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration. The applicant sought to overturn a finding of 5% permanent disability after apportionment for a neck injury, arguing the medical examiner's opinion was not substantial evidence and that treatment couldn't be apportioned. The Board found the administrative law judge's reliance on the medical examiner's opinion, which attributed the worsening condition to pre-existing degenerative arthritis, was supported by substantial evidence. The Board also clarified that further medical treatment was awarded, but surgery specifically would be considered non-industrial due to the apportionment finding.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.