Home/Case Law/DAVID PELLETIER vs. UNITED STRUCTURES, INC., CIGA by its Servicing Facility CAMBRIDGE on behalf of FREMONT COMPENSATION, in liquidation
Regular DecisionReconsideration

DAVID PELLETIER vs. UNITED STRUCTURES, INC., CIGA by its Servicing Facility CAMBRIDGE on behalf of FREMONT COMPENSATION, in liquidation

Filed: Feb 02, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ3905674 (SRO 0031254)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of its decision regarding attorney's fees. The applicant's attorney sought fees under Labor Code sections 4607 and 5814.5, arguing the defendant unreasonably failed to appoint a new case manager and pay prior bills. The Board affirmed the judge's finding that Labor Code § 4607 fees are inapplicable when the entire award is not terminated, and Labor Code § 5814.5 fees require an existing award and unreasonable refusal to pay. The Board found no evidence of unreasonable delay by the defendant in appointing a new case manager, thus denying the petition.

DAVID PELLETIER vs. UNITED STRUCTURES, INC., CIGA by its Servicing Facility CAMBRIDGE on behalf of FREMONT COMPENSATION, in liquidation is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of its decision regarding attorney's fees. The applicant's attorney sought fees under Labor Code sections 4607 and 5814.5, arguing the defendant unreasonably failed to appoint a new case manager and pay prior bills. The Board affirmed the judge's finding that Labor Code § 4607 fees are inapplicable when the entire award is not terminated, and Labor Code § 5814.5 fees require an existing award and unreasonable refusal to pay. The Board found no evidence of unreasonable delay by the defendant in appointing a new case manager, thus denying the petition.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

DAVID PELLETIER vs. UNITED STRUCTURES, INC., CIGA by its Servicing Facility CAMBRIDGE on behalf of FREMONT COMPENSATION, in liquidation workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

DAVID PELLETIER vs. UNITED STRUCTURES, INC., CIGA by its Servicing Facility CAMBRIDGE on behalf of FREMONT COMPENSATION, in liquidation case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

DAVID PELLETIER vs. UNITED STRUCTURES, INC., CIGA by its Servicing Facility CAMBRIDGE on behalf of FREMONT COMPENSATION, in liquidation Case Analysis

DAVID PELLETIER vs. UNITED STRUCTURES, INC., CIGA by its Servicing Facility CAMBRIDGE on behalf of FREMONT COMPENSATION, in liquidation is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.