Home/Case Law/DAVID OCHOA vs. FREEPORT MCMORAN OIL AND GAS, GALLAGHER BASSETT
Regular DecisionRemoval

DAVID OCHOA vs. FREEPORT MCMORAN OIL AND GAS, GALLAGHER BASSETT

Filed: Mar 11, 2016
Van Nuys
ADJ9693677

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the applicant's Petition for Removal. Removal is an extraordinary remedy reserved for cases where substantial prejudice or irreparable harm would result if not granted, and reconsideration would be an inadequate remedy. The WCAB found no such prejudice or harm, also noting the applicant's attorney violated procedural rules by attaching previously filed documents. Furthermore, the applicant's attorney failed to demonstrate diligence in pursuing necessary medical evaluations, leading the WCAB to uphold the judge's decision to set the matter for trial.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the applicant's Petition for Removal. Removal is an extraordinary remedy reserved for cases where substantial prejudice or irreparable harm would result if not granted, and reconsideration would be an inadequate remedy. The WCAB found no such prejudice or harm, also noting the applicant's attorney violated procedural rules by attaching previously filed documents. Furthermore, the applicant's attorney failed to demonstrate diligence in pursuing necessary medical evaluations, leading the WCAB to uphold the judge's decision to set the matter for trial.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

DAVID OCHOA vs. FREEPORT MCMORAN OIL AND GAS, GALLAGHER BASSETT (2016) – Van Nuys | CompFox