CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration and rescinded the previous Findings and Orders due to defective service on the applicant, making the petition timely. The core issue is whether the applicant, who performed renovation work, was an employee or a residential employee under Labor Code section 3351(d). The WCAB found insufficient evidence to determine if the work was performed in the course of the owner's trade, business, or occupation. The case is returned for further proceedings and a new decision, potentially involving the Uninsured Employer Benefit Trust Fund.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration and rescinded the previous Findings and Orders due to defective service on the applicant, making the petition timely. The core issue is whether the applicant, who performed renovation work, was an employee or a residential employee under Labor Code section 3351(d). The WCAB found insufficient evidence to determine if the work was performed in the course of the owner's trade, business, or occupation. The case is returned for further proceedings and a new decision, potentially involving the Uninsured Employer Benefit Trust Fund.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.