CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for removal, an extraordinary remedy requiring a showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The defendant sought removal to vacate a finding that vocational expert reports lacked substantial evidence due to not observing the applicant's visible foot injury. The Board found no such prejudice or irreparable harm, deeming reconsideration an adequate remedy. The Board also noted a processing delay due to a file misplacement.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for removal, an extraordinary remedy requiring a showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The defendant sought removal to vacate a finding that vocational expert reports lacked substantial evidence due to not observing the applicant's visible foot injury. The Board found no such prejudice or irreparable harm, deeming reconsideration an adequate remedy. The Board also noted a processing delay due to a file misplacement.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.