CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to correct clerical errors in a prior award regarding an applicant's permanent disability rate and duration. The Board affirmed the administrative law judge's findings of industrial injury, temporary total disability, and 80 percent permanent disability. However, the Board clarified the calculation of permanent disability payments and amended the award to include CIGA and the insolvent carrier as defendants.
DAVID HISERODT vs. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CHIROPRACTIC, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, BROADSPIRE, A CRAWFORD COMPANY, SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to correct clerical errors in a prior award regarding an applicant's permanent disability rate and duration. The Board affirmed the administrative law judge's findings of industrial injury, temporary total disability, and 80 percent permanent disability. However, the Board clarified the calculation of permanent disability payments and amended the award to include CIGA and the insolvent carrier as defendants.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.