Home/Case Law/DAVID HERNANDEZ vs. RUSSELL FISHER PARTNERSHIPS, ICW GROUP/EXPLORER INSURANCE CO.
Regular DecisionReconsideration

DAVID HERNANDEZ vs. RUSSELL FISHER PARTNERSHIPS, ICW GROUP/EXPLORER INSURANCE CO.

Filed: Oct 11, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ6446674

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration, upholding the original finding that he did not sustain an industrial injury. The Board also granted removal on its own motion and intends to sanction the applicant's counsel for submitting a petition with handwritten annotations to an already admitted document, violating procedural rules. This constitutes a violation of Rule 10842(c), warranting sanctions unless good cause is shown within 15 days.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration, upholding the original finding that he did not sustain an industrial injury. The Board also granted removal on its own motion and intends to sanction the applicant's counsel for submitting a petition with handwritten annotations to an already admitted document, violating procedural rules. This constitutes a violation of Rule 10842(c), warranting sanctions unless good cause is shown within 15 days.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

DAVID HERNANDEZ vs. RUSSELL FISHER PARTNERSHIPS, ICW GROUP/EXPLORER INSURANCE CO. (2011) – San Francisco | CompFox