Home/Case Law/DAVID GARCIA vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; Permissibly Self-Insured; administered by TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT
Regular DecisionReconsideration

DAVID GARCIA vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; Permissibly Self-Insured; administered by TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT

Filed: Jan 11, 2018
Van Nuys
ADJ8547958

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration because the WCJ's decision on medical evidence disclosure was not a final order, as it did not determine substantive rights or threshold issues. Additionally, the Board denied the petition for removal, finding no evidence of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm to the applicant, nor that reconsideration would be an inadequate remedy later. Therefore, the Board concluded that interlocutory procedural orders are not subject to reconsideration or removal.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration because the WCJ's decision on medical evidence disclosure was not a final order, as it did not determine substantive rights or threshold issues. Additionally, the Board denied the petition for removal, finding no evidence of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm to the applicant, nor that reconsideration would be an inadequate remedy later. Therefore, the Board concluded that interlocutory procedural orders are not subject to reconsideration or removal.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

DAVID GARCIA vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; Permissibly Self-Insured; administered by TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT (2018) – Van Nuys | CompFox