Home/Case Law/DAVID DANLEY vs. WALMART ASSOCIATES, INC., ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

DAVID DANLEY vs. WALMART ASSOCIATES, INC., ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Jul 30, 2018
Van Nuys
ADJ7582791

CompFox AI Summary

Here's a summary of the case for a lawyer, in four sentences: The applicant, David Danley, who sustained a 100% permanent and total disability, sought to increase his permanent disability indemnity rate beyond the stipulated $410.00 weekly. He argued his recently completed Ph.D. demonstrated an increased earning capacity pursuant to Labor Code § 4453(c)(4), which should be considered despite lower actual earnings at the time of injury. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, agreeing with the WCJ that the applicant failed to provide specific, demonstrable evidence of a concrete job that would have yielded higher earnings. The Board concluded that potential future earnings based on education are too speculative unless supported by specific employment opportunities.

DAVID DANLEY vs. WALMART ASSOCIATES, INC., ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in Van Nuys. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Van Nuys.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Here's a summary of the case for a lawyer, in four sentences:

The applicant, David Danley, who sustained a 100% permanent and total disability, sought to increase his permanent disability indemnity rate beyond the stipulated $410.00 weekly. He argued his recently completed Ph.D. demonstrated an increased earning capacity pursuant to Labor Code § 4453(c)(4), which should be considered despite lower actual earnings at the time of injury. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, agreeing with the WCJ that the applicant failed to provide specific, demonstrable evidence of a concrete job that would have yielded higher earnings. The Board concluded that potential future earnings based on education are too speculative unless supported by specific employment opportunities.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

DAVID DANLEY vs. WALMART ASSOCIATES, INC., ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY workers compensation case in Van Nuys. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

DAVID DANLEY vs. WALMART ASSOCIATES, INC., ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY case law summary from Van Nuys. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

DAVID DANLEY vs. WALMART ASSOCIATES, INC., ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY Case Analysis

DAVID DANLEY vs. WALMART ASSOCIATES, INC., ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Van Nuys. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.