Home/Case Law/DAVID CABRERA vs. MITCHELL GEIGER, CITY OF RIVERSIDE
Regular Decision

DAVID CABRERA vs. MITCHELL GEIGER, CITY OF RIVERSIDE

Filed: Jul 09, 2012
Riverside
ADJ6668361

CompFox AI Summary

Curtis W. Montgomery Chiropractic Corporation's Petition for Removal was dismissed because they failed to demonstrate prejudice from an order continuing a mandatory settlement conference. Montgomery also failed to serve the applicant and, critically, has not filed a lien in the case. Without a filed lien, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board lacks jurisdiction over Montgomery's claim for reimbursement. Consequently, the petition is dismissed.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Curtis W. Montgomery Chiropractic Corporation's Petition for Removal was dismissed because they failed to demonstrate prejudice from an order continuing a mandatory settlement conference. Montgomery also failed to serve the applicant and, critically, has not filed a lien in the case. Without a filed lien, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board lacks jurisdiction over Montgomery's claim for reimbursement. Consequently, the petition is dismissed.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

DAVID CABRERA vs. MITCHELL GEIGER, CITY OF RIVERSIDE (2012) – Riverside | CompFox