CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration of an amended award. The defendant argued that the medical opinions relied upon by the judge were not substantial evidence. However, the Board found the opinions of Dr. Shorr, the agreed panel qualified medical examiner, to be substantial evidence. Dr. Shorr opined that the applicant's obesity was aggravated by decreased activity post-injury and required treatment to relieve the work injury. The Board adopted the judge's reasoning in denying reconsideration.
DAVID ANDERSON vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION; CALIPATRIA STATE PRISON is a workers' compensation case decided in San Bernardino. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Bernardino.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration of an amended award. The defendant argued that the medical opinions relied upon by the judge were not substantial evidence. However, the Board found the opinions of Dr. Shorr, the agreed panel qualified medical examiner, to be substantial evidence. Dr. Shorr opined that the applicant's obesity was aggravated by decreased activity post-injury and required treatment to relieve the work injury. The Board adopted the judge's reasoning in denying reconsideration.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.