Home/Case Law/DARRYL FREITAS vs. HANSEL PRESTIGE, TOWER SELECT INSURANCE
Regular Decision

DARRYL FREITAS vs. HANSEL PRESTIGE, TOWER SELECT INSURANCE

Filed: Jun 28, 2013
Santa Rosa
ADJ8558683

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration because it was filed from a non-final order, specifically a Notice of Hearing, not a final determination of substantive rights or liabilities. The Board also denied the defendant's request for removal, finding no evidence of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The Board admonished the defendant's attorney for filing what bordered on a frivolous petition, which improperly interrupted the proceedings. Consequently, the matter proceeded as if no reconsideration or removal had been sought.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration because it was filed from a non-final order, specifically a Notice of Hearing, not a final determination of substantive rights or liabilities. The Board also denied the defendant's request for removal, finding no evidence of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The Board admonished the defendant's attorney for filing what bordered on a frivolous petition, which improperly interrupted the proceedings. Consequently, the matter proceeded as if no reconsideration or removal had been sought.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

DARRYL FREITAS vs. HANSEL PRESTIGE, TOWER SELECT INSURANCE (2013) – Santa Rosa | CompFox