Home/Case Law/DARRIEN GORDON vs. OAKLAND RAIDERS, PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY, XCHANGING, INC., ATLANTA FALCONS, ST PAUL TRAVELERS
Regular DecisionReconsideration

DARRIEN GORDON vs. OAKLAND RAIDERS, PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY, XCHANGING, INC., ATLANTA FALCONS, ST PAUL TRAVELERS

Filed: Mar 22, 2011
Anaheim
ADJ865164 (AHM 0127447)

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns a professional football player's cumulative trauma injury claim. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to correct an arbitrator's apportionment of liability. The Board found that under Labor Code section 5500.5, liability should be based on employment within the one year preceding the date of injury. Consequently, Travelers Indemnity, as insurer for the Atlanta Falcons, was ordered to reimburse the Oakland Raiders for 4% of benefits paid, reflecting the Falcons' minimal employment during the last year of injury. This reversed the original award which had apportioned liability at 39%.

DARRIEN GORDON vs. OAKLAND RAIDERS, PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY, XCHANGING, INC., ATLANTA FALCONS, ST PAUL TRAVELERS is a workers' compensation case decided in Anaheim. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Anaheim.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns a professional football player's cumulative trauma injury claim. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to correct an arbitrator's apportionment of liability. The Board found that under Labor Code section 5500.5, liability should be based on employment within the one year preceding the date of injury. Consequently, Travelers Indemnity, as insurer for the Atlanta Falcons, was ordered to reimburse the Oakland Raiders for 4% of benefits paid, reflecting the Falcons' minimal employment during the last year of injury. This reversed the original award which had apportioned liability at 39%.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

DARRIEN GORDON vs. OAKLAND RAIDERS, PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY, XCHANGING, INC., ATLANTA FALCONS, ST PAUL TRAVELERS workers compensation case in Anaheim. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

DARRIEN GORDON vs. OAKLAND RAIDERS, PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY, XCHANGING, INC., ATLANTA FALCONS, ST PAUL TRAVELERS case law summary from Anaheim. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

DARRIEN GORDON vs. OAKLAND RAIDERS, PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY, XCHANGING, INC., ATLANTA FALCONS, ST PAUL TRAVELERS Case Analysis

DARRIEN GORDON vs. OAKLAND RAIDERS, PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY, XCHANGING, INC., ATLANTA FALCONS, ST PAUL TRAVELERS is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Anaheim. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.