Home/Case Law/DARREN ROGERS vs. NATIONAL BEEF, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

DARREN ROGERS vs. NATIONAL BEEF, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE

Filed: Jan 29, 2018
San Diego
ADJ9741944, ADJ9741226

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board granted Med-Legal's petition for removal, rescinding the WCJ's orders for Med-Legal to produce a fee agreement with Chisvin Law Group and for applicant's attorney to appear and testify. The Board found that the fee agreement is a privileged lawyer-client communication protected by the Evidence Code and that compelling the applicant's former attorney to testify without a subpoena violates procedural requirements. The case is returned to the WCJ for further proceedings consistent with this decision.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board granted Med-Legal's petition for removal, rescinding the WCJ's orders for Med-Legal to produce a fee agreement with Chisvin Law Group and for applicant's attorney to appear and testify. The Board found that the fee agreement is a privileged lawyer-client communication protected by the Evidence Code and that compelling the applicant's former attorney to testify without a subpoena violates procedural requirements. The case is returned to the WCJ for further proceedings consistent with this decision.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

DARREN ROGERS vs. NATIONAL BEEF, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE (2018) – San Diego | CompFox