CompFox AI Summary
Applicant Darren Hailey sought reconsideration of two Findings and Awards from October 19, 2021, in cases ADJ11207109 and ADJ11207111, where a WCJ found industrial injuries but apportioned 50 percent of permanent disability to nonindustrial factors based on a Qualified Medical Evaluator's (QME) opinion. Hailey contended that the QME's apportionment opinion was not substantial medical evidence. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, in a majority decision, affirmed the WCJ's findings, concluding that the QME adequately explained the basis of his apportionment, attributing 50 percent of the impairment to nonindustrial obesity due to its role in inhibiting recovery and causing accelerated wear and tear on joints. However, Commissioner Katherine A. Zalewski dissented, agreeing that the QME identified the factors of permanent disability but arguing that he failed to adequately explain how he arrived at the 50 percent apportionment figure, deeming the analysis incomplete.
Darren Hailey vs. Continental Labor, National Union Fire Insurance Company is a workers' compensation case decided in Bakersfield. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Bakersfield.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Applicant Darren Hailey sought reconsideration of two Findings and Awards from October 19, 2021, in cases ADJ11207109 and ADJ11207111, where a WCJ found industrial injuries but apportioned 50 percent of permanent disability to nonindustrial factors based on a Qualified Medical Evaluator's (QME) opinion. Hailey contended that the QME's apportionment opinion was not substantial medical evidence. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, in a majority decision, affirmed the WCJ's findings, concluding that the QME adequately explained the basis of his apportionment, attributing 50 percent of the impairment to nonindustrial obesity due to its role in inhibiting recovery and causing accelerated wear and tear on joints. However, Commissioner Katherine A. Zalewski dissented, agreeing that the QME identified the factors of permanent disability but arguing that he failed to adequately explain how he arrived at the 50 percent apportionment figure, deeming the analysis incomplete.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.