CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration because it was filed from a non-final interlocutory order. The Board also denied the applicant's petition for removal, finding no evidence of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm that would warrant this extraordinary remedy. The WCJ's report, adopted by the Board, explained that the order at issue only addressed procedural or evidentiary issues, not substantive rights or liabilities. Consequently, both petitions were denied as procedurally improper.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration because it was filed from a non-final interlocutory order. The Board also denied the applicant's petition for removal, finding no evidence of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm that would warrant this extraordinary remedy. The WCJ's report, adopted by the Board, explained that the order at issue only addressed procedural or evidentiary issues, not substantive rights or liabilities. Consequently, both petitions were denied as procedurally improper.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.