Home/Case Law/DARRELL TOLE vs. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, COTTINGHAM AND BUTLER CLAIMS SERVICES, BIAGI BROTHERS INCORPORATED
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

DARRELL TOLE vs. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, COTTINGHAM AND BUTLER CLAIMS SERVICES, BIAGI BROTHERS INCORPORATED

Filed: Sep 29, 2025
Santa Rosa
ADJ16120106

CompFox AI Summary

Defendant filed a Petition for Reconsideration of the Findings, Award and Orders (FA&O) issued July 2, 2025, which found a closed period of temporary disability for applicant Darrell Tole, a truck driver who sustained injury to bilateral knees on February 18, 2022. The defendant argued that the finding of temporary disability required contemporaneous medical reporting. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the petition, agreeing with the WCJ's report that PQME chiropractor Michaels' medical opinion, supported by medical and testimonial evidence, constituted substantial evidence for the temporary disability period. The WCAB also noted the WCJ's credibility determination was given great weight.

DARRELL TOLE vs. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, COTTINGHAM AND BUTLER CLAIMS SERVICES, BIAGI BROTHERS INCORPORATED is a workers' compensation case decided in Santa Rosa. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Santa Rosa.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Defendant filed a Petition for Reconsideration of the Findings, Award and Orders (FA&O) issued July 2, 2025, which found a closed period of temporary disability for applicant Darrell Tole, a truck driver who sustained injury to bilateral knees on February 18, 2022. The defendant argued that the finding of temporary disability required contemporaneous medical reporting. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the petition, agreeing with the WCJ's report that PQME chiropractor Michaels' medical opinion, supported by medical and testimonial evidence, constituted substantial evidence for the temporary disability period. The WCAB also noted the WCJ's credibility determination was given great weight.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

DARRELL TOLE vs. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, COTTINGHAM AND BUTLER CLAIMS SERVICES, BIAGI BROTHERS INCORPORATED workers compensation case in Santa Rosa. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

DARRELL TOLE vs. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, COTTINGHAM AND BUTLER CLAIMS SERVICES, BIAGI BROTHERS INCORPORATED case law summary from Santa Rosa. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

DARRELL TOLE vs. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, COTTINGHAM AND BUTLER CLAIMS SERVICES, BIAGI BROTHERS INCORPORATED Case Analysis

DARRELL TOLE vs. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, COTTINGHAM AND BUTLER CLAIMS SERVICES, BIAGI BROTHERS INCORPORATED is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Santa Rosa. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.