Home/Case Law/DAPHNE LIPTON vs. OFFICE TEAM and INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Administered By AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, AEROSOLES, KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICES
Regular DecisionReconsideration/Removal

DAPHNE LIPTON vs. OFFICE TEAM and INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Administered By AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, AEROSOLES, KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICES

Filed: Mar 16, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ4085752 (OAK 0339695)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration and removal as untimely filed. The applicant failed to file within the statutory 20-day period after receiving the WCJ's decisions. Furthermore, the petition lacked required verification and did not demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, both grounds for dismissal. The Board noted that the applicant's purported appeals concerned decisions that either favored her or were not final orders.

DAPHNE LIPTON vs. OFFICE TEAM and INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Administered By AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, AEROSOLES, KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration and removal as untimely filed. The applicant failed to file within the statutory 20-day period after receiving the WCJ's decisions. Furthermore, the petition lacked required verification and did not demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, both grounds for dismissal. The Board noted that the applicant's purported appeals concerned decisions that either favored her or were not final orders.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

DAPHNE LIPTON vs. OFFICE TEAM and INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Administered By AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, AEROSOLES, KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICES workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

DAPHNE LIPTON vs. OFFICE TEAM and INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Administered By AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, AEROSOLES, KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICES case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

DAPHNE LIPTON vs. OFFICE TEAM and INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Administered By AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, AEROSOLES, KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICES Case Analysis

DAPHNE LIPTON vs. OFFICE TEAM and INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Administered By AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, AEROSOLES, KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICES is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.