CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration. The applicant sought to challenge a prior WCAB decision that rescinded a judge's award and remanded the case for apportionment under Labor Code section 4664(c)(1). The WCAB ruled that reconsideration cannot be sought for interlocutory procedural orders that do not finally determine substantive rights or liabilities. Therefore, the applicant's petition was dismissed as procedurally improper.
DANIEL L. GORDON vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration. The applicant sought to challenge a prior WCAB decision that rescinded a judge's award and remanded the case for apportionment under Labor Code section 4664(c)(1). The WCAB ruled that reconsideration cannot be sought for interlocutory procedural orders that do not finally determine substantive rights or liabilities. Therefore, the applicant's petition was dismissed as procedurally improper.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.