CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board dismissed the employer's Petition for Reconsideration as the appealed order was procedural, not final. The Board granted the employer's Petition for Removal and rescinded the original order concerning the Qualified Medical Evaluator (QME) panel. This action returns the case to the trial level for new proceedings to ensure compliance with Labor Code section 4062.2's procedures for selecting a medical evaluator in a represented employee's denied claim.
DANIEL A. BELLING vs. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board dismissed the employer's Petition for Reconsideration as the appealed order was procedural, not final. The Board granted the employer's Petition for Removal and rescinded the original order concerning the Qualified Medical Evaluator (QME) panel. This action returns the case to the trial level for new proceedings to ensure compliance with Labor Code section 4062.2's procedures for selecting a medical evaluator in a represented employee's denied claim.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.