Home/Case Law/DANIEIGH KLEIN (Deceased) RICHARD KLEIN II (Widow) vs. HANGTOWN CHEVRON FOOD MART, SAFECO LOS ANGELES
Regular Decisionnull

DANIEIGH KLEIN (Deceased) RICHARD KLEIN II (Widow) vs. HANGTOWN CHEVRON FOOD MART, SAFECO LOS ANGELES

Filed: Feb 01, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ6990856, ADJ2473330

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's Petition for Removal in case ADJ2473330 due to a clerical error. In case ADJ6990856, the Board denied the defendant's Petition for Removal, upholding the WCJ's denial of the defendant's motion to dismiss the death benefit claim. The defendant sought to dismiss the claim based on the statute of limitations (Labor Code § 5406), but the Board found that a dismissal without trial is impermissible, and the defendant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm to justify removal.

DANIEIGH KLEIN (Deceased) RICHARD KLEIN II (Widow) vs. HANGTOWN CHEVRON FOOD MART, SAFECO LOS ANGELES is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's Petition for Removal in case ADJ2473330 due to a clerical error. In case ADJ6990856, the Board denied the defendant's Petition for Removal, upholding the WCJ's denial of the defendant's motion to dismiss the death benefit claim. The defendant sought to dismiss the claim based on the statute of limitations (Labor Code § 5406), but the Board found that a dismissal without trial is impermissible, and the defendant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm to justify removal.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

DANIEIGH KLEIN (Deceased) RICHARD KLEIN II (Widow) vs. HANGTOWN CHEVRON FOOD MART, SAFECO LOS ANGELES workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

DANIEIGH KLEIN (Deceased) RICHARD KLEIN II (Widow) vs. HANGTOWN CHEVRON FOOD MART, SAFECO LOS ANGELES case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

DANIEIGH KLEIN (Deceased) RICHARD KLEIN II (Widow) vs. HANGTOWN CHEVRON FOOD MART, SAFECO LOS ANGELES Case Analysis

DANIEIGH KLEIN (Deceased) RICHARD KLEIN II (Widow) vs. HANGTOWN CHEVRON FOOD MART, SAFECO LOS ANGELES is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.