Home/Case Law/DAN HAGAN vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, K-MART and SEDGWICK
Regular DecisionRemoval

DAN HAGAN vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, K-MART and SEDGWICK

Filed: Apr 16, 2013
San Francisco
ADJ2947144 (SAC 0288806), ADJ4018561 (SAC 0305133)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted a Petition for Removal regarding case numbers ADJ2947144 and ADJ4018561. Consequently, the WCAB rescinded the Workers' Compensation Judge's (WCJ) January 22, 2013 decision. The matter has been returned to the trial level for further proceedings and a new decision by the WCJ. This action indicates the WCAB found the original decision flawed and requires additional judicial review.

DAN HAGAN vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, K-MART and SEDGWICK is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted a Petition for Removal regarding case numbers ADJ2947144 and ADJ4018561. Consequently, the WCAB rescinded the Workers' Compensation Judge's (WCJ) January 22, 2013 decision. The matter has been returned to the trial level for further proceedings and a new decision by the WCJ. This action indicates the WCAB found the original decision flawed and requires additional judicial review.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

DAN HAGAN vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, K-MART and SEDGWICK workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

DAN HAGAN vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, K-MART and SEDGWICK case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

DAN HAGAN vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, K-MART and SEDGWICK Case Analysis

DAN HAGAN vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, K-MART and SEDGWICK is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.