Home/Case Law/DAMASO GALLARO RUIZ, DAMASO GALLARDO-RUIZ vs. HYATT CORPORATION, BROADSPIRE, INSURANCE COMPANY OF STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Regular DecisionReconsideration

DAMASO GALLARO RUIZ, DAMASO GALLARDO-RUIZ vs. HYATT CORPORATION, BROADSPIRE, INSURANCE COMPANY OF STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA

Filed: Oct 15, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ2216957

CompFox AI Summary

The WCAB denied the lien claimant's petition for reconsideration. The WCJ found that the lien claimant failed to meet their burden of proof because they did not produce any exhibits or testimony at trial, despite having been given the opportunity to present their case.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The WCAB denied the lien claimant's petition for reconsideration. The WCJ found that the lien claimant failed to meet their burden of proof because they did not produce any exhibits or testimony at trial, despite having been given the opportunity to present their case.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

DAMASO GALLARO RUIZ, DAMASO GALLARDO-RUIZ vs. HYATT CORPORATION, BROADSPIRE, INSURANCE COMPANY OF STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA (2009) – San Francisco | CompFox