Home/Case Law/DAKOTA ROBINSON vs. LOS ANGELES ANGELS OF ANAHEIM, SEDGWICK
Regular DecisionReconsideration

DAKOTA ROBINSON vs. LOS ANGELES ANGELS OF ANAHEIM, SEDGWICK

Filed: Mar 23, 2015
Anaheim
ADJ8984604

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, which found the applicant's treating physician was properly designated, even utilizing telemedicine. The report also addressed flaws in the defendant's arguments regarding the PQME's report, particularly its failure to address shoulder injuries and its unclear apportionment. Finally, the report upheld the established continuous trauma period.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, which found the applicant's treating physician was properly designated, even utilizing telemedicine. The report also addressed flaws in the defendant's arguments regarding the PQME's report, particularly its failure to address shoulder injuries and its unclear apportionment. Finally, the report upheld the established continuous trauma period.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

DAKOTA ROBINSON vs. LOS ANGELES ANGELS OF ANAHEIM, SEDGWICK (2015) – Anaheim | CompFox