Home/Case Law/ CYNTHIA WILLIAMS, vs. FORD MEEHAN INSURANCE; CIGA and its servicing facility, SEDGWICK CMS FOR RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation; MULLIN CONSULTING; FARMERS INSURANCE & EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
Regular DecisionReconsideration

CYNTHIA WILLIAMS, vs. FORD MEEHAN INSURANCE; CIGA and its servicing facility, SEDGWICK CMS FOR RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation; MULLIN CONSULTING; FARMERS INSURANCE & EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Filed: Jun 18, 2013
San Francisco
ADJ4618855 (VNO 0403261) ADJ181556 (VNO 0501021)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied CIGA's petition for reconsideration, upholding the finding that CIGA, as administrator for Reliance Insurance, is solely liable for the applicant's injuries sustained between November 2, 1998, and July 19, 1999. The WCAB adopted the judge's report which found that the applicant's subsequent employment did not contribute to her disability. The decision was based on extensive medical evidence and the judge's determination of credibility regarding the applicant's testimony and the Agreed Medical Examiner's reports. CIGA's arguments regarding reliance on specific medical opinions and the admission of evidence were rejected by the WCAB.

CYNTHIA WILLIAMS, vs. FORD MEEHAN INSURANCE; CIGA and its servicing facility, SEDGWICK CMS FOR RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation; MULLIN CONSULTING; FARMERS INSURANCE & EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied CIGA's petition for reconsideration, upholding the finding that CIGA, as administrator for Reliance Insurance, is solely liable for the applicant's injuries sustained between November 2, 1998, and July 19, 1999. The WCAB adopted the judge's report which found that the applicant's subsequent employment did not contribute to her disability. The decision was based on extensive medical evidence and the judge's determination of credibility regarding the applicant's testimony and the Agreed Medical Examiner's reports. CIGA's arguments regarding reliance on specific medical opinions and the admission of evidence were rejected by the WCAB.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

CYNTHIA WILLIAMS, vs. FORD MEEHAN INSURANCE; CIGA and its servicing facility, SEDGWICK CMS FOR RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation; MULLIN CONSULTING; FARMERS INSURANCE & EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

CYNTHIA WILLIAMS, vs. FORD MEEHAN INSURANCE; CIGA and its servicing facility, SEDGWICK CMS FOR RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation; MULLIN CONSULTING; FARMERS INSURANCE & EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

CYNTHIA WILLIAMS, vs. FORD MEEHAN INSURANCE; CIGA and its servicing facility, SEDGWICK CMS FOR RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation; MULLIN CONSULTING; FARMERS INSURANCE & EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Case Analysis

CYNTHIA WILLIAMS, vs. FORD MEEHAN INSURANCE; CIGA and its servicing facility, SEDGWICK CMS FOR RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation; MULLIN CONSULTING; FARMERS INSURANCE & EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.