Home/Case Law/CYNTHIA ROSE (KEEN) vs. MENDOCINO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, KEENAN AND ASSOCIATES
Regular DecisionDisqualification

CYNTHIA ROSE (KEEN) vs. MENDOCINO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, KEENAN AND ASSOCIATES

Filed: Oct 18, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ5751441

CompFox AI Summary

Here's a summary for a lawyer:

Applicant sought to disqualify the Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) based on alleged enmity and bias against her attorney stemming from a September 1, 2011 incident. The WCJ responded by stating that all decisions are based on evidence and he will conduct hearings fairly. The Appeals Board adopted the WCJ's report, finding no reason to doubt his impartiality, and therefore denied the disqualification petition.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Here's a summary for a lawyer:

Applicant sought to disqualify the Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) based on alleged enmity and bias against her attorney stemming from a September 1, 2011 incident. The WCJ responded by stating that all decisions are based on evidence and he will conduct hearings fairly. The Appeals Board adopted the WCJ's report, finding no reason to doubt his impartiality, and therefore denied the disqualification petition.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CYNTHIA ROSE (KEEN) vs. MENDOCINO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, KEENAN AND ASSOCIATES (2011) – San Francisco | CompFox