CompFox AI Summary
This case involves an applicant alleging new and further permanent total disability stemming from a 1999 industrial injury. The defendant sought reconsideration, arguing the administrative law judge erred in finding the injury caused $100%$ permanent disability. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, adopting the judge's report. The Board found substantial medical evidence supported the $100%$ disability rating based on a primary treating physician's opinion that the applicant was unable to compete in the open labor market due to severe orthopedic restrictions.
CYNTHIA HARDEMAN vs. INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES; CNA is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves an applicant alleging new and further permanent total disability stemming from a 1999 industrial injury. The defendant sought reconsideration, arguing the administrative law judge erred in finding the injury caused $100%$ permanent disability. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, adopting the judge's report. The Board found substantial medical evidence supported the $100%$ disability rating based on a primary treating physician's opinion that the applicant was unable to compete in the open labor market due to severe orthopedic restrictions.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.