Home/Case Law/CYNTHIA CADLE vs. CHICO CREEK HEALTH CARE, CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, CNA CLAIMS PLUS, FREMONT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

CYNTHIA CADLE vs. CHICO CREEK HEALTH CARE, CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, CNA CLAIMS PLUS, FREMONT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA

Filed: Jun 30, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ1504736 (RDG 094722) ADJ2325354 (RDG 0122147)

CompFox AI Summary

In Case ADJ1504736, the Board granted reconsideration, finding applicant sustained industrial injury to her right knee as a compensable consequence of her left knee injury from February 2, 2000, remanding for determination of benefits. In Case ADJ2325354, the Board denied reconsideration and removal, affirming the WCJ's findings regarding injury on May 19, 2005, including the 18% permanent disability award and apportionment of benefits. The Board found applicant waived arguments regarding new discovery and the Almaraz/Guzman standard by failing to raise them timely. The WCJ's apportionment of permanent disability for the 2005 injury was upheld based on medical reports and deposition testimony.

CYNTHIA CADLE vs. CHICO CREEK HEALTH CARE, CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, CNA CLAIMS PLUS, FREMONT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

In Case ADJ1504736, the Board granted reconsideration, finding applicant sustained industrial injury to her right knee as a compensable consequence of her left knee injury from February 2, 2000, remanding for determination of benefits. In Case ADJ2325354, the Board denied reconsideration and removal, affirming the WCJ's findings regarding injury on May 19, 2005, including the 18% permanent disability award and apportionment of benefits. The Board found applicant waived arguments regarding new discovery and the Almaraz/Guzman standard by failing to raise them timely. The WCJ's apportionment of permanent disability for the 2005 injury was upheld based on medical reports and deposition testimony.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

CYNTHIA CADLE vs. CHICO CREEK HEALTH CARE, CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, CNA CLAIMS PLUS, FREMONT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

CYNTHIA CADLE vs. CHICO CREEK HEALTH CARE, CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, CNA CLAIMS PLUS, FREMONT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

CYNTHIA CADLE vs. CHICO CREEK HEALTH CARE, CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, CNA CLAIMS PLUS, FREMONT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA Case Analysis

CYNTHIA CADLE vs. CHICO CREEK HEALTH CARE, CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, CNA CLAIMS PLUS, FREMONT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.