Home/Case Law/CURTIS BROWN vs. PINE HILL CONSTRUCTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

CURTIS BROWN vs. PINE HILL CONSTRUCTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Nov 17, 2015
Los Angeles
ADJ7459972

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration and rescinded a dismissal order due to a due process violation. The applicant argued he was not properly served and was still treating for his injury. The WCAB found that the lack of an attorney substitution filing in EAMS likely caused the service issue. Consequently, the dismissal order was vacated, and the case was returned for further proceedings.

CURTIS BROWN vs. PINE HILL CONSTRUCTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in Los Angeles. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Los Angeles.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration and rescinded a dismissal order due to a due process violation. The applicant argued he was not properly served and was still treating for his injury. The WCAB found that the lack of an attorney substitution filing in EAMS likely caused the service issue. Consequently, the dismissal order was vacated, and the case was returned for further proceedings.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

CURTIS BROWN vs. PINE HILL CONSTRUCTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND workers compensation case in Los Angeles. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

CURTIS BROWN vs. PINE HILL CONSTRUCTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND case law summary from Los Angeles. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

CURTIS BROWN vs. PINE HILL CONSTRUCTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND Case Analysis

CURTIS BROWN vs. PINE HILL CONSTRUCTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Los Angeles. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.