Home/Case Law/CURTIS BAKER vs. UCSB, SEDGWICK CMS
Regular DecisionReconsideration

CURTIS BAKER vs. UCSB, SEDGWICK CMS

Filed: Nov 16, 2007
GOL 0099895

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding that Curtis Baker's claim was not barred by the statute of limitations. The Board determined that Baker did not possess sufficient knowledge of the industrial causation of his knee injury until an agreed medical examiner opined on February 12, 2007. Consequently, the case was returned to the trial level for further proceedings.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding that Curtis Baker's claim was not barred by the statute of limitations. The Board determined that Baker did not possess sufficient knowledge of the industrial causation of his knee injury until an agreed medical examiner opined on February 12, 2007. Consequently, the case was returned to the trial level for further proceedings.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CURTIS BAKER vs. UCSB, SEDGWICK CMS (2007) – | CompFox