CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding that Curtis Baker's claim was not barred by the statute of limitations. The Board determined that Baker did not possess sufficient knowledge of the industrial causation of his knee injury until an agreed medical examiner opined on February 12, 2007. Consequently, the case was returned to the trial level for further proceedings.
CURTIS BAKER vs. UCSB, SEDGWICK CMS is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding that Curtis Baker's claim was not barred by the statute of limitations. The Board determined that Baker did not possess sufficient knowledge of the industrial causation of his knee injury until an agreed medical examiner opined on February 12, 2007. Consequently, the case was returned to the trial level for further proceedings.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.