CompFox AI Summary
This case affirms a WCJ's decision finding the applicant sustained a 12% permanent disability. The applicant sought reconsideration, arguing the WCJ erred by limiting rebuttal evidence to wage loss rather than loss of long-term earning capacity and denying costs for a vocational expert. The Appeals Board, relying on precedent from Ogilvie v. City and County of San Francisco, held that the vocational expert's opinion was not substantial evidence to rebut the permanent disability rating. Therefore, the WCJ's denial of the vocational expert's costs was also affirmed.
CRYSTAL VOS vs. STEVEN CHANG, DDS, ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case affirms a WCJ's decision finding the applicant sustained a 12% permanent disability. The applicant sought reconsideration, arguing the WCJ erred by limiting rebuttal evidence to "wage loss" rather than "loss of long-term earning capacity" and denying costs for a vocational expert. The Appeals Board, relying on precedent from Ogilvie v. City and County of San Francisco, held that the vocational expert's opinion was not substantial evidence to rebut the permanent disability rating. Therefore, the WCJ's denial of the vocational expert's costs was also affirmed.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.