CompFox AI Summary
This case involves a lien claimant seeking reimbursement for translation services provided to a workers' compensation applicant. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration and amended the original order to allow reimbursement for interpreter services on one specific date, May 31, 2006. The WCAB clarified that reimbursement is not conditioned on the physician's report constituting "substantial evidence" if services were actually provided by a qualified interpreter, distinguishing this from prior disallowances where service provision was unsubstantiated. The WCAB adopted the trial judge's reasoning for most disallowances while clarifying the legal standard for reimbursement of interpreter services.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves a lien claimant seeking reimbursement for translation services provided to a workers' compensation applicant. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration and amended the original order to allow reimbursement for interpreter services on one specific date, May 31, 2006. The WCAB clarified that reimbursement is not conditioned on the physician's report constituting "substantial evidence" if services were actually provided by a qualified interpreter, distinguishing this from prior disallowances where service provision was unsubstantiated. The WCAB adopted the trial judge's reasoning for most disallowances while clarifying the legal standard for reimbursement of interpreter services.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.