Home/Case Law/Cresthaven Nursing Residence v. Freeman
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Cresthaven Nursing Residence v. Freeman

Filed: May 19, 2003
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
07-02-0011-CV

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves an appeal in a health care liability claim where the appellees, daughters of Wanda Granger, sued Cresthaven Nursing Residence, Cantex Healthcare Centers, and its general partners for negligence that allegedly resulted in Granger's injury and death. A jury awarded $9 million, which was subject to a statutory damage cap. The appellate court initially found prejudgment interest was not subject to the cap and suggested remittiturs for excessive damages. However, on rehearing, the court modified its decision, aligning with a new Supreme Court ruling that prejudgment interest is included in the damage cap, and affirmed the judgment with an adjusted cap of $1,413,008.13. Key issues included the application of the damage cap, prejudgment interest calculation, spoliation instruction, and expert witness qualification.

Cresthaven Nursing Residence v. Freeman is a workers' compensation case decided in Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo). This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo).

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves an appeal in a health care liability claim where the appellees, daughters of Wanda Granger, sued Cresthaven Nursing Residence, Cantex Healthcare Centers, and its general partners for negligence that allegedly resulted in Granger's injury and death. A jury awarded $9 million, which was subject to a statutory damage cap. The appellate court initially found prejudgment interest was not subject to the cap and suggested remittiturs for excessive damages. However, on rehearing, the court modified its decision, aligning with a new Supreme Court ruling that prejudgment interest is included in the damage cap, and affirmed the judgment with an adjusted cap of $1,413,008.13. Key issues included the application of the damage cap, prejudgment interest calculation, spoliation instruction, and expert witness qualification.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Cresthaven Nursing Residence v. Freeman workers compensation case in Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo). Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Cresthaven Nursing Residence v. Freeman case law summary from Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo). Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Cresthaven Nursing Residence v. Freeman Case Analysis

Cresthaven Nursing Residence v. Freeman is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo). This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.