CompFox AI Summary
This case concerns an applicant's claim for $8%$ permanent partial disability related to a right shoulder injury. The defendant sought reconsideration, arguing the award was not supported by substantial medical evidence under the AMA Guides. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding neither the treating physician's nor the QME's report provided sufficient evidence. Therefore, the matter is returned to the trial level for further development of the record on permanent disability.
CORTEZ vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION is a workers' compensation case decided in Bakersfield. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Bakersfield.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case concerns an applicant's claim for $8%$ permanent partial disability related to a right shoulder injury. The defendant sought reconsideration, arguing the award was not supported by substantial medical evidence under the AMA Guides. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding neither the treating physician's nor the QME's report provided sufficient evidence. Therefore, the matter is returned to the trial level for further development of the record on permanent disability.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.