Home/Case Law/Corliss Anderson vs. WAL-MART STORES INC, YORK
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

Corliss Anderson vs. WAL-MART STORES INC, YORK

Filed: Dec 12, 2019
Van Nuys
ADJ10447246

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration and denied her Petition for Removal. The applicant sought reconsideration of an order suspending her petition to quash a subpoena duces tecum due to missing documentation. The Board found that the order was not a final order, making reconsideration improper, and that removal was not warranted as the applicant could still cure the deficiencies. Therefore, the applicant's requests were dismissed and denied.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration and denied her Petition for Removal. The applicant sought reconsideration of an order suspending her petition to quash a subpoena duces tecum due to missing documentation. The Board found that the order was not a final order, making reconsideration improper, and that removal was not warranted as the applicant could still cure the deficiencies. Therefore, the applicant's requests were dismissed and denied.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.