Home/Case Law/CONSTANCE VOIGT vs. BOEING COMPANY, INSURANCE COMPANY of the STATE of PENNSYLVANIA, AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, A.A.S.I., ARGONAUT INSURANCE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

CONSTANCE VOIGT vs. BOEING COMPANY, INSURANCE COMPANY of the STATE of PENNSYLVANIA, AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, A.A.S.I., ARGONAUT INSURANCE

Filed: Aug 04, 2008
San Francisco
ANA 0339254ANA 0339253

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, amending the award to grant retroactive vocational rehabilitation maintenance allowance (VRMA) at the applicant's temporary disability rate, finding that repealed vocational rehabilitation statutes still apply to pre-2004 injuries. However, the Board affirmed the exclusion of the period the applicant was temporarily disabled due to non-industrial causes. The applicant's contention that the defendant's appeal was untimely was also denied.

CONSTANCE VOIGT vs. BOEING COMPANY, INSURANCE COMPANY of the STATE of PENNSYLVANIA, AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, A.A.S.I., ARGONAUT INSURANCE is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, amending the award to grant retroactive vocational rehabilitation maintenance allowance (VRMA) at the applicant's temporary disability rate, finding that repealed vocational rehabilitation statutes still apply to pre-2004 injuries. However, the Board affirmed the exclusion of the period the applicant was temporarily disabled due to non-industrial causes. The applicant's contention that the defendant's appeal was untimely was also denied.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

CONSTANCE VOIGT vs. BOEING COMPANY, INSURANCE COMPANY of the STATE of PENNSYLVANIA, AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, A.A.S.I., ARGONAUT INSURANCE workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

CONSTANCE VOIGT vs. BOEING COMPANY, INSURANCE COMPANY of the STATE of PENNSYLVANIA, AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, A.A.S.I., ARGONAUT INSURANCE case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

CONSTANCE VOIGT vs. BOEING COMPANY, INSURANCE COMPANY of the STATE of PENNSYLVANIA, AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, A.A.S.I., ARGONAUT INSURANCE Case Analysis

CONSTANCE VOIGT vs. BOEING COMPANY, INSURANCE COMPANY of the STATE of PENNSYLVANIA, AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, A.A.S.I., ARGONAUT INSURANCE is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.