Home/Case Law/CON PADDACK vs. CITY OF BARSTOW
Regular DecisionReconsideration

CON PADDACK vs. CITY OF BARSTOW

Filed: Aug 20, 2007
San Francisco
VNO 421908

CompFox AI Summary

The applicant's petition for reconsideration was dismissed as untimely. The applicant filed their petition at a district office, rather than the designated San Francisco office, and it was not filed in San Francisco until after the statutory deadline. Consequently, the Board found it lacked jurisdiction to consider the petition's merits.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The applicant's petition for reconsideration was dismissed as untimely. The applicant filed their petition at a district office, rather than the designated San Francisco office, and it was not filed in San Francisco until after the statutory deadline. Consequently, the Board found it lacked jurisdiction to consider the petition's merits.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CON PADDACK vs. CITY OF BARSTOW (2007) – San Francisco | CompFox