CompFox AI Summary
Christy Calvert Collins appeals a trial court's judgment denying her post-judgment suit for enforcement against her former husband, Thomas Moroch. Collins argues the trial court erred by granting Moroch's rule 306a motion, awarding attorney's fees to her former attorney, Luke Gunnstaks, and finding personal property provisions ambiguous. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding Collins waived her challenge to the rule 306a motion, and that Gunnstaks's intervention for attorney's fees was proper. Collins's claims for damages and attorney's fees were denied due to inadequate briefing or no abuse of discretion by the trial court.
Collins v. MOROCH is a workers' compensation case decided in Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas). This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas).
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Christy Calvert Collins appeals a trial court's judgment denying her post-judgment suit for enforcement against her former husband, Thomas Moroch. Collins argues the trial court erred by granting Moroch's rule 306a motion, awarding attorney's fees to her former attorney, Luke Gunnstaks, and finding personal property provisions ambiguous. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding Collins waived her challenge to the rule 306a motion, and that Gunnstaks's intervention for attorney's fees was proper. Collins's claims for damages and attorney's fees were denied due to inadequate briefing or no abuse of discretion by the trial court.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.