CompFox AI Summary
This case concerns a Petition for Removal filed by the applicant in a workers' compensation claim. The applicant sought removal because the Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) allegedly erred in setting the case for trial despite the need for further medical discovery. The Appeals Board denied the petition, finding no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm to the applicant, and that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy. The Board also cautioned parties against altering Minutes of Hearing without consulting the WCJ.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case concerns a Petition for Removal filed by the applicant in a workers' compensation claim. The applicant sought removal because the Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) allegedly erred in setting the case for trial despite the need for further medical discovery. The Appeals Board denied the petition, finding no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm to the applicant, and that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy. The Board also cautioned parties against altering Minutes of Hearing without consulting the WCJ.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.