Home/Case Law/CLORIA CONTRERAS vs. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Permissibly Self Insured, Adjusted by OCTAGON RISK SERVICES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

CLORIA CONTRERAS vs. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Permissibly Self Insured, Adjusted by OCTAGON RISK SERVICES

Filed: Dec 26, 2007
San Francisco
LBO 0316609, LBO 0316610

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration for Case LBO 316609, upholding the finding of no disability from a cumulative right shoulder injury. For Case LBO 316610, the Board granted reconsideration and amended the award to defer the issues of temporary disability and the applicant's permanent and stationary date, while affirming the rest of the original decision, including the 23% permanent disability rating. The Board's decision aligns with the judge's report, which recommended further development of the record on deferred issues and temporary disability.

CLORIA CONTRERAS vs. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Permissibly Self Insured, Adjusted by OCTAGON RISK SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration for Case LBO 316609, upholding the finding of no disability from a cumulative right shoulder injury. For Case LBO 316610, the Board granted reconsideration and amended the award to defer the issues of temporary disability and the applicant's permanent and stationary date, while affirming the rest of the original decision, including the 23% permanent disability rating. The Board's decision aligns with the judge's report, which recommended further development of the record on deferred issues and temporary disability.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

CLORIA CONTRERAS vs. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Permissibly Self Insured, Adjusted by OCTAGON RISK SERVICES workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

CLORIA CONTRERAS vs. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Permissibly Self Insured, Adjusted by OCTAGON RISK SERVICES case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

CLORIA CONTRERAS vs. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Permissibly Self Insured, Adjusted by OCTAGON RISK SERVICES Case Analysis

CLORIA CONTRERAS vs. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Permissibly Self Insured, Adjusted by OCTAGON RISK SERVICES is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.