CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded an Order Approving Compromise and Release (OACR), and returned the case to the trial level. This was done despite the applicant's untimely petition for reconsideration, on equitable grounds due to extrinsic mistake. The mistake arose because the WCJ approved the OACR without knowledge of the applicant's prior notification to the defendant of his desire to withdraw from the settlement, a fact belatedly brought to the court's attention. The matter is remanded for the WCJ to re-evaluate the compromise and release agreement, considering factors like disbursement of funds.
CLIFFORD HASKIN vs. SVENHARDS SWEDISH BAKERY, SAFECO is a workers' compensation case decided in Oakland. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Oakland.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded an Order Approving Compromise and Release (OACR), and returned the case to the trial level. This was done despite the applicant's untimely petition for reconsideration, on equitable grounds due to extrinsic mistake. The mistake arose because the WCJ approved the OACR without knowledge of the applicant's prior notification to the defendant of his desire to withdraw from the settlement, a fact belatedly brought to the court's attention. The matter is remanded for the WCJ to re-evaluate the compromise and release agreement, considering factors like disbursement of funds.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.