Home/Case Law/CLIFFORD GAMBLE vs. UNITED AIRLINES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

CLIFFORD GAMBLE vs. UNITED AIRLINES

Filed: Jan 10, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ2976308 (AHM 0075910) ADJ1926826 (AHM 0077308)

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns an applicant's claim for vocational rehabilitation benefits from United Airlines. The applicant interrupted services and did not seek reinstatement until over five years after the date of injury, which is beyond the statute of limitations. The Board denied reconsideration, finding that the applicant's vested right to benefits did not overcome the expired statute of limitations due to the delay. Applicant's arguments regarding improper notice, equitable tolling, and prior litigation were also rejected.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns an applicant's claim for vocational rehabilitation benefits from United Airlines. The applicant interrupted services and did not seek reinstatement until over five years after the date of injury, which is beyond the statute of limitations. The Board denied reconsideration, finding that the applicant's vested right to benefits did not overcome the expired statute of limitations due to the delay. Applicant's arguments regarding improper notice, equitable tolling, and prior litigation were also rejected.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CLIFFORD GAMBLE vs. UNITED AIRLINES (2011) – San Francisco | CompFox